|     home
MISC.   |   MISC. 2   |   misc. 3   |   misc. 4   |   misc. 5   |   MISC 6   |   intuition   |   opinions   |   Painter   |   DRIVERS   |   Virus   |   ALPTRAUM   |   Country codes   |   life   |   blonde   |   19 things   |   staff descriptions   |   ABOUT ME   |   ENGLISH LINKS   |   EURO LINKS   |   Lieber Hund   |   athiest   |   star wars vs titanic   |   enemies   |   Strange Tale   |   truths   |   TEDDIES ON TOUR   |   Teddies on tour 2   |   SENILITY PRAYER
Strange Tale
At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS President
Dr Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications of a
bizarre death. Here is the story.

On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and
concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.

Mr Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-storey building intending to commit
suicide. He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell past the
ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window,
which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been
installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers
and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the
way he had planned. "Ordinarily," Dr Millscontinued, "A person who sets
out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism
might not be what he intended, is still defined ascommitting suicide."
That Mr Opus was shot on the way to certain death,but probably would not
have been successful because of the safety net, causedthe medical examiner
to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.

In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, wasoccupied
by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was
threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when he
pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went
through the window striking Mr Opus.
When one intends to kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt,
one is guilty of the murder of subject "B." When confronted with the murder
charge the old man and his wife were both adamant and both said that they
thought the shotgun was unloaded.

The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the
unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the
killing of Mr Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, if the gun had been
accidentally loaded. The continuing investigation turned up a witness who
saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to
the fatal accident.

It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and
the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly,
loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder
even though he didn't actually pull the trigger.

The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of
Ronald Opus. Now comes the exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed
that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent
over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder.

This led him to jump off the ten storey building on March 23rd, only to be
killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window. The son
had actually murdered himself so the medical examiner closed the case as
a suicide.

(A true story from Associated Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt)